Ironically, I’ve had this conversation at the dinner table with my three teenaged budding engineers. They love to read, but HATE the books for their English class.
I was pointed to this article recently. It makes some interesting points. I’m not sure I agree with all of it, but there is definitely some food for thought here. What do you think?
Michael Pacher. St. Wolfgang and the Devil
4 Ways High School Makes You Hate Reading
By: Christina H
I can’t be the only one who feels like the schools pulled a sort of bait-and-switch job on us when it came to reading. When I was in elementary school, they went to a lot of trouble to make sure we thought reading was fun, with bookmobiles and read-a-thons and tons of fun books about mice and motorcycles and phantom tollbooths…
That was the bait. In junior high and high school, they made the switch. I guess they heard about how drug dealers give you free doses of the good stuff until you are addicted, and then once you are hooked, they start cutting it with 50 percent baby powder or something…
So one summer you are reading A Wrinkle in Time or Fantastic Mr. Fox or whatever, and then you show up for your first day of school and BAM, The Scarlet Letter. And get on that pronto, kid, because we are going to talk about metaphors and symbolism in Chapter 1 tomorrow. I opened these books thinking they would be great and rewarding, like the books I was used to, but it was like biting into a delicious-looking cake and finding a bear trap. After my face had been so destroyed by so many bear traps (to continue the metaphor) that the greatest reconstructive surgeon in the world could do nothing to save it, I stopped looking at books as wonderful presents I couldn’t wait to open and started looking at them with a sort of low-level PTSD.
Let me be clear: I still love reading good books, but since experience has taught me that there’s about a 95 percent chance that a random (adult) book I pick up is going to be unenjoyable, I spend more time researching a book before I read it than I spent researching my house before I bought it. It’s crazy to have to be so scared and wary of something I used to look forward to so much.
I think this kind of experience is part of why only 50 percent of American adults have read any novel, short story, poem or play in the past year, and only 54 percent have read any kind of book at all that wasn’t required…
And as a disclaimer, I know there’s going to be people out there who loved The Scarlet Letter or A Separate Peace or what have you and feel like they got a lot out of it, and teachers who manage to get kids really engaged in discussing literature, and that is cool, but I don’t think that’s the common experience. Here are the sorts of things I think are going on a lot more often:
#4. High School Required Reading Sucks
The Scarlet Letter, Wuthering Heights, Great Expectations, Ethan Frome, Walden, Heart of Darkness, Madame Bovary, The Catcher in the Rye and The Sun Also Rises all suck. OK, that’s just my opinion, but the average high school student — … the average human being — will probably agree on a bunch of those at least.
What really gets my goat is when people act like this is our problem. They say the reason we don’t like these books is because we don’t get it…
#3. You’re Not Allowed to Talk Smack About the Books
Even if you love literature and had a pretty good high school reading experience, you probably can agree that at least one book you were asked to read (in your opinion) sucked. There might be excessive exposition, laughable imagery, characters intended to be sympathetic who are grating or characters intended to be grating who are so grating that you can’t pay attention to the story (Holden Caulfield).
There are very few classrooms where you are encouraged to express this point of view, because I think a lot of teachers feel like if you admit to the book not being that great, then you open yourself up to the kids arguing that they shouldn’t have to read it. I don’t think it has to go there. I think teaching well-reasoned smack talk has a lot of value…
#2. Anything Fun Is Too Shallow
…The argument is that fun and popular books are too shallow to get much out of. They’re not going to have as many themes, or new vocabulary words, or symbols, or unusual storytelling techniques as a classic novel. And that’s probably true in a lot of cases. The point they’re missing here is that most high school classes never even get close to digging out all the analyzable stuff from a book, because of time limits or limits of the students’ reading level…
#1. Enjoy Reading? Preposterous!
There is a point in time where a lot of adults stop telling kids that reading is fun and start telling them that reading should be work. That if you’re not improving your mind and broadening your horizons, reading that book is just a waste of your time. …
And this teacher feels like kids should not waste their summers reading The Hunger Games because they don’t gain much “verbal and world knowledge,” recommending The Red Badge of Courage and a bunch of nonfiction books about the horrors experienced by real people in other times and places, like Hiroshima, well-known as a great summer romp. These are really valuable books, and kids should have some idea about the world around them, but seriously, even in the summer, they can’t read a book just for fun?
She says: “Summer assignments should be about why we need to learn and why we need to talk about what we think.” Sure, that’s an important lesson that needs to be taught at some point, but when is there time for them to learn the other important lesson: Reading is something you can also do for fun, when you are taking a break from learning? You can’t just tell people that and hope they remember it when they graduate and finally have time for it. That’s something they need to learn by doing it and experiencing the fun…
As for me, I haven’t given up on reading. I’m still looking for good books to read, but I’ve been burned so much by recommendations that I’ve instituted a new procedure for the approval of any new reading material. I will require at least five notarized affidavits from me-certified book evaluators who give the book at least 4 out of 5 stars in three major evaluation categories (pacing, character development and amount of dinosaurs, for example) before I will read it. Certification is a fairly straightforward process involving an application in which you list your favorite books and other media and a brief essay describing what you think I am looking for in a book. If your application is satisfactory, it will be followed by two phone interviews. Certification can be revoked at any time if evidence surfaces of you reading Fifty Shades of Grey or other disqualifying material unless you can submit witness statements from two independent evaluators testifying that you were only reading it so you could write jokes about it. This might sound like a great deal of trouble to recommend a book, but think about what’s at stake, man. I could be bored for several hours! Who wants that on their hands?
Related articles
- Banned books–is your child reading them? (mysouthwestga.com)
- Op-Ed: What’s Wrong With Reading? (artsandyouthlove.wordpress.com)
- Literacy instruction in public schools is ‘Dismal’ (costofcollege.wordpress.com)
- South Dakotan brings love of reading to Cambodia (rapidcityjournal.com)

October 6, 2012 at 10:17 am
Hi, thanks for featuring my Op-ed on your post. I agree a hundred percent with this article, especially with numbers four and one.
October 7, 2012 at 8:21 pm
It was a very interesting read. Thanks for coming by.
October 6, 2012 at 12:12 pm
Maybe it is because I’m older, I have a sightly different spin on this idea. I know that I was forced to read many books that I didn’t like and some I hated. However it was the experience of writing and analyzing the books that I disliked the most. All of the symbolism of “Walden; or, Life in the Woods,” by Thoreau to this day makes me cringe. I didn’t enjoy that book not did I ever “get” the symbolism. Sometimes I wonder if I was old enough to understand what my teacher meant.
None of this ever made me fear books in general. I had enough experience with enjoyable reading to understand that I might have to wade through the sucky to find the good ones. I hope that high school kids will be encouraged to read for pleasure as well as for the exercise of learning. I know I was and am am many stories richer for it.
Thanks Maria for your posts. They are often thought provoking and always interesting.
October 7, 2012 at 8:21 pm
I never learned to fear books, but I did learn to hate English class. So much so that I worke3d hard to place out of college English. I managed to go through BA, M.Ed, and PhD. without taking another English class.
I bred a back of engineers, so they don’t love English to start with and it has been a real challenge to teach them to like to read in spite of hating what they have to read for school.
Thanks Jadie!
October 6, 2012 at 8:45 pm
I first experienced this from the other side. In one of the first class sessions in my 9th grade English class, the teacher revealed that he had been a chemistry major in college. He admitted to liking reading too much to spoil it by majoring in English. LOL
October 7, 2012 at 8:19 pm
LOL, that is too funny! Sounds like it was a great class!
Thanks Margaret.
October 7, 2012 at 7:04 pm
My high school required reading was about 50% enjoyment and 50% torture. I rarely completed the books I didn’t like but managed to somehow get good grades by listening to the class discussions. I think my favorite book from high school was The Mayor of Casterbridge. Just the thought of The Old Man and the Sea makes me cringe. My teacher beat the symbolism horse to death and when I got to the end with no fish I literally threw the book down on the floor. Lol
October 7, 2012 at 8:17 pm
I hate to confess the number of books I didn’t read in HS, but alas it is true. My biggest traumas were over ‘Jude the Obscure’ and ‘Heart of Darkness’ <>. Both of those were taught with far too much emphasis on the symbolism ect. I still want to curl into a fetal position at any mention of either of those books!
Thanks Monica!
October 7, 2012 at 9:52 pm
I wonder whether the deadly overanalysis of literature is more of an American phenomenon? I went through a phase of reading a lot of Virginia Woolf, her novels, her nephew’s (Quentin Bell) excellent biography (all others are superfluous), her letters and journal, plus other writings by Bloomsberries (nickname for her crowd). She and her writer friends didn’t have much respect for American academics as I recall. And I can understand why. My significant other, Byron was in grad school (chemistry!) in Texas in the late 50s. He’s told me that getting a degree in English at that time meant the student spent hours counting word usage. (a chore that would take minutes using today’s computers.) They seem to be missing out on the total purpose of literature, which is to hit the reader in his heart and mind.
What a waster of energy.